Facebook oversight board twitter Please note that public testimony now takes place at the end of the meeting. This information came to light due to the reporting of the Wall Street Journal, and we are grateful to the efforts of journalists who have shed greater light on issues that are relevant to the Board’s mission. Facebook’s new Oversight Board is a wild new experiment in platform governance. Summary Last week, new information emerged on Facebook’s ‘cross-check’ system, which the company uses to review content decisions relating to some high-profile users. Full Case Decision. In the 1960s, inspired by challenges of the Civil Rights Era, oversight boards had more longevity. The Oversight Board upholds Meta’s decision to remove the content from Facebook for violating the Violence and Incitement Community Standard. Today the Oversight Board accepted a case referral from Facebook to examine their decision to indefinitely suspend former US President Donald Trump’s access to post content on Facebook and Instagram. Oversight Board. The Board finds that the three posts did not violate Meta’s Violence and Incitement policy, as they did not incite or threaten violence but were rhetorical comments about abortion policy. We do this by providing an independent check on Meta’s content moderation, making (1/2): The Board will announce its decision on the case concerning former US President Trump's indefinite suspension from Facebook and Instagram in the coming weeks. Board decisions do not necessarily represent the views of all Members. The Oversight Board has overturned Facebook’s decision to remove content that it designated as health misinformation that “contributes to the risk of imminent . If a Facebook content decision is eligible for review by the Oversight Board, you'll see an Oversight Board Reference Number within your Support Inbox. Trump’s access to post content on Facebook and Instagram on January 7, The Oversight Board’s decision. May 5, 2021 the need to contain misinformation about COVID-19 pushed Facebook and Twitter into a role they never wanted—arbiters of the truth. Given that Meta subsequently restored the content after the user’s appeal to the Board, it must now remove the content once again from the platform. The Chair outlined a vision to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Fund’s processes and programmes through automation, signalling a significant step towards modernization. Since the Board started accepting cases last October, we have now received more than 860,000 requests from users to examine Meta’s content moderation decisions. Announcing the Oversight Board’s Next Cases. The Facebook post does not violate Meta’s Manipulated Media policy, which applies only to video created through artificial intelligence (AI Not all content decisions are eligible for appeal to the Oversight Board. Candidate for Mayor Assassinated in Mexico. Oversight Board Opens Public Comments for Policy Advisory Opinion on Cross-Check. Facebook’s normal penalties include removing Facebook footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon Youtube footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon The Facebook Files and the Limitations of Oversight Board. Effective board oversight is contingent upon establishing and adhering to a thorough framework of legal guidelines that dictate fiduciary duties, conflicts of interest management, board meeting requirements, and whistleblower protection, among other vital principles. Specifically, it used profanity to reference Chinese governmental policy in Hong Kong as part of a political discussion on the Chinese evelyn douek explains details of Facebook Oversight Board’s recent decision and what they reveal about Facebook’s rules, and the FOB’s role in reviewing them. The board must also oversee the organization's risk management processes, certifying that compliance risks are identified The Oversight Board upholds Meta’s decision to restore to Facebook a post containing a video, with a caption, that depicts violence against a civilian in Sudan. These two cases concern content decisions made by Meta, on Facebook and Instagram, which the Oversight Board intends to address together. It has weighed in on several highly consequential cases and addressed major flashpoints of disagreement around the world, some referred by the company and others selected by the Today, the Oversight Board is announcing its first decisions. In overturning one of Meta’s decisions to remove a Facebook post, the Board has considered how these cases raise the broader issue of how to distinguish content that criticizes state actions and policies from attacks against people based on their nationality. In this case, the Board upheld Meta’s decision to take down the content after concluding that, given the The Oversight Board will address the two cases below together, choosing either to uphold or overturn Meta’s decisions on a case-by-case basis. In October, the Board accepted a request from Meta, in the form of a policy advisory opinion, to review the company’s cross-check system and make recommendations on how it can be changed. The Board found that the post did not target Chinese people, but the Chinese state. Expanding the Board’s scope. None of these cases had easy answers and The Oversight Board has overturned Facebook’s decision to remove a Facebook post showing a video of protesters in Colombia criticizing the Colombian president, Ivan Duque. They are not Meta employees and cannot be removed by the company. Each contains imagery of the attack. Policy advisory statement. In the implementation of oversight boards, the importance of transparency and In Brief: In the wake of 2020, states and localities created a number of new civilian police accountability boards to meet widespread demand for transparency. December 2, 2021. The Board has upheld Facebook’s decision on January 7, 2021, to restrict then-President Donald Trump’s access to posting content on his Facebook page and Instagram account. In October 2023, two Facebook users separately posted screenshots showing partial information shared by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) on X (formerly Twitter), ahead of the Indigenous Voice to Parliament The Oversight Board has upheld Meta’s decision to leave up a video that was edited to make it appear as though U. Following the publication of our first case decisions, the Board is announcing its next cases and opening the public comments process. physical harm. In making recommendations to amend Meta’s Hate Speech policy and address At any point following the submission of your appeal, you’ll be able to check the appeal status by logging on to the Oversight Board’s website using your reference number. Its decisions are based on whether Meta’s content enforcement is consistent with the company’s policies, values and human rights commitments. In the video, protesters used a word which Facebook has designated as a slur that violates its Hate Speech Community Standard for being a direct attack against people based I. The Board reviews and, where necessary, reverses the company's decisions. As content will be live on Facebook and Instagram, many people will be able to report the same piece of content. The Oversight Board has upheld Meta’s decisions to remove two separate Facebook posts containing the same screenshot of information posted on X by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), ahead of Australia’s Indigenous Voice to Parliament The board's oversight responsibilities span a range of activities, including reviewing and approving the organization's compliance program, monitoring its implementation, and verifying that it is adequately resourced. ” The Oversight Board found that Facebook’s decision did not comply with its Community Standards, its values, or international human rights standards. Since then, there has been an expansion of oversight boards from less than 40 in the 1980s to over A semi-autonomous oversight board for Facebook has upheld a suspension of former US President Donald Trump, but orders a review to be conducted by the social media giant within six months. The three posts were shared by different users in November 2023, following the Hamas terrorist attacks of October 7 and the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The policy advisory opinion published today is the Board’s response to that request. Today, the Oversight Board published its Transparency Report for the second half of 2023. The post was restored under the newsworthiness allowance with a warning screen marking the content as sensitive, making it generally inaccessible to minors, and requiring all other Learn about Facebook's Oversight Board and how they make decisions. The Board declines Facebook’s request and insists that Facebook apply and justify a defined penalty. The powers of civilian oversight boards are limited and often their recommendations go unimplemented; 45 percent of the boards surveyed by NACOLE do not have any current statutes or ordinances requiring law enforcement officers to cooperate with the oversight boards. The Oversight Board upholds Meta’s original decision to remove the content. About the Case. You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your The Oversight Board is a body that makes consequential precedent -setting content moderation decisions on the social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, in a form of "platform self Since its creation in 2020, Meta’s oversight board has been viewed as a novel attempt at accountability in the tech industry. ” Assessing Impact in Our Transparency Reports. 4 Meta is the parent company of popular social We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Civilian boards have limited power, and despite community members' attempts to change that, law enforcement and legislators are increasingly aligned. Following the ruling, Mr Trump wrote that "what Facebook, Twitter, and Google have done is a total Great expectations surround Facebook’s Oversight Board, an audacious experiment in platform self-regulation, with its first 20 members announced on May 6. This lack of transparency can lead to unethical behavior, as decisions are made without scrutiny or oversight. *Case summaries provide an overview of the case and do not have precedential value. Where users have exhausted Facebook’s appeals process, they can challenge the company’s decision by appealing eligible content to the Oversight Board. The Oversight Board, comprising independent Members from around the world, makes binding decisions on what content Facebook and Instagram Oversight Board The Oversight Board’s decisions are made by panels of five Members and approved by a majority vote of the full Board. Executive summary. Keep in mind that the board only selects a certain number of eligible appeals, so they may not choose yours to review. It’ll look like the US Supreme Court — with four times as many “justices” and serving more than 10 times Case Description. 2. Summary decisions directly bring about changes to Meta's decisions, providing transparency on these corrections, while identifying where Meta could improve its enforcement. Evelyn Douek. In the five case decisions published today, the Board overturned four of Facebook’s decisions, upheld one and issued nine policy recommendations to the company. In states like Florida and Tennessee, legislators have all Donald Trump's ban from Facebook and Instagram has been upheld by Facebook's Oversight Board. The Oversight Board considered the following authorities and standards: I. However, it was not appropriate for Facebook to impose the indeterminate and standardless penalty of indefinite suspension. To protect our independence, Board Members contract directly with the Oversight Board. Section 8 of the Oversight Board Charter, titled ‘Selection and removal of Board members’, (Facebook, 2019, p. The Oversight Board overturns Facebook’s decision to remove the content, requiring the post to be restored. Oversight Board decision. Facebook footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon Youtube footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon We will publish our final decisions on the Oversight Board website. Oversight Board Decision. The Board reviews the original decision to increase understanding of the content moderation processes involved, reduce errors and increase fairness for Facebook and Instagram users. Time and again, Facebook has shown an unwillingness to cooperate with regulators and adhere to oversight measures, despite repeated failures to protect user data. . This includes providing regular updates on organizational performance, financial reports Improvements to how users appeal to the Board through Facebook’s mobile app as well as the growing profile of the Board may have contributed to this increase. Oversight Board Upholds Meta’s Decisions in Australian Electoral Commission Voting Rules Cases. In December 2022, the Oversight Board publicly critici zed not only the program’s detrimental effects but also the company’s disingenuousness in describing its purpose. 40,812 likes · 1,114 talking about this. In July 2022, the Oversight Board accepted a request from Meta to assess whether it should continue to remove certain categories of COVID-19 misinformation, or whether a less restrictive approach would better align with its values and human rights responsibilities. In August 2024, a Facebook user posted an altered picture based on the poster for the 1994 comedy film “Dumb and Dumber. The Iranian government also blocked access to Instagram and WhatsApp in September 2022 amid protests over The Oversight Board comes close to achieving the structure recommended by the Leveson Report. To comply with Meta’s human rights commitments and address these problems, a program that corrects the most high-impact errors on Facebook and Instagram should be structured substantially differently. Dec Following the Journal’s reporting, Meta formally asked the Oversight Board for recommendations on how to reform the cross-check system. Note: The Oversight Board is an independent organization that examines Meta's decisions to remove or leave up content on Facebook, Instagram and Threads in a selected number of emblematic cases. The benefit to Facebook in limiting Oversight Board’s scope and power have come to light through a recent document leak. Decision Summary. We welcome applications to our Administration from passionate individuals around the world. The Board recommends that Facebook: These two cases concern content decisions made by Meta, both on Facebook, which the Oversight Board intends to address together. In the first case, an administrator of a Facebook page, which describes itself as the official page of Poland’s far-right coalition party, Confederation (Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość The Board reviews the original decision to increase understanding of the content moderation process, reduce errors and increase fairness for Facebook and Instagram users. We pride ourselves on a collegial, collaborative In reviewing three cases involving different pieces of Facebook content containing the phrase “From the River to the Sea,” the Board finds they did not break Meta’s rules on Hate Speech, Violence and Incitement or Dangerous Organizations and Individuals. These three cases concern decisions made by Meta to remove content from Facebook, which the Oversight Board intends to address together. ’ This penalty is not described in Facebook’s content policies. Oversight Board decisions: The most relevant previous decisions of the Oversight Board include: “Tigray Communication Affairs Bureau” case ( 2022-006-FB-MR). Twitter ; The Real Facebook Oversight Board. To that end, the Oversight Board has established a public comment process to invite subject matter experts and interested groups to share relevant research and information that may help the Oversight Board deliberate specific cases. However, there is currently no overarching framework for understanding the They are approved by a Board Member panel, rather than the full Board, do not involve public comments and do not have precedential value for the Board. Learn about Facebook's Oversight Board and how they make decisions. These guidelines guarantee responsible decision-making, transparency, and Facebook footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon Youtube footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon This public Allegheny County Jail Oversight Board (ACJOB) meeting usually takes place on the first Thursday of every month. It has no Oversight Board. President Joe Biden is inappropriately touching his adult granddaughter’s chest. Ensuring respect for free expression and human rights on Facebook, Instagram and Threads through binding decisions on content and policy The Oversight Board makes decisions on what content Facebook & Instagram should allow or remove, based on respect for freedom of expression & human rights. The cases covered four continents: Asia, Europe, North America and South America. presidential candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. 1. The Oversight Board has overturned Facebook’s decision to remove content The Oversight Board is committed to bringing diverse perspectives from third parties into our case and policy review process. The Oversight Board has overturned Facebook’s decision to remove a post in Burmese under its Hate Speech Community Standard. “While Meta told the board that The Real Facebook Oversight Board is a diverse global coalition of the most dynamic, creative and critical voices today in civil rights, human rights, social media policy, disinformation research, extremism and the role of social media in society. Since the announcement and establishment of the Oversight Board (OB) by the technology company Meta as an independent institution reviewing Facebook and Instagram’s content moderation decisions, the OB has been subjected to scholarly scrutiny ranging from praise to criticism. . The Oversight Board has overturned Meta’s decision to leave up a video on Facebook in which Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen threatens his political opponents with violence. Ann Njuguna, emphasised the organisation’s commitment to forging strategic partnerships for the long haul. In a policy advisory statement, the Board recommends that Facebook: Ensure that users are always notified of the reasons for any enforcement of the Community Standards against them, including the From today, users will be able to appeal content to the Oversight Board which they want removed from Facebook and Instagram. 10. 18,665 likes · 312 talking about this. In a policy advisory statement, the Board recommends that Facebook: Ensure that its Internal Implementation Standards are available in the language in which content moderators review content. 9. Case Significance These cases highlight Meta’s failure to distinguish between supportive references to organizations it designates as dangerous, which are 2024-053-FB-MR, 2024-054-IG-MR, 2024-055-IG-UA, 2024-056-IG-UA. Shortly after, Meta released more details about this request and These two cases concern content decisions made by Meta, on Facebook and Instagram, which the Oversight Board intends to address together. The changes have raised questions about the role of the Oversight Board, which was created, Zuckerberg once said, because “Facebook should not make so many important decisions about free Meta's Oversight Board, the company's independent group created to help with sensitive policy decisions, is preparing to weigh in on CEO Mark Zuckerberg's recent changes to how Facebook, Instagram We apply Facebook, Instagram and Threads’ content standards in a way that protects freedom of expression and other global human rights standards. In the first case, a Facebook user in the United States posted a video of a woman confronting a transgender woman for using the women’s bathroom. The Board has made 32 recommendations in this area, many of which are summarized below. The Oversight Board overturns Facebook’s decision to take down the content, requiring the post to be restored. “The Board also found Facebook violated its own rules by imposing a suspension that was ‘indefinite. Three posts were shared by different users on Facebook immediately after the March 22, 2024, terrorist attack at a concert venue and shopping center in Moscow. Facebook has also requested policy recommendations from the Board on suspensions when the user is a political leader. By publicly making recommendations to Meta and publicly monitoring its responses and implementation, we have opened a space for transparent dialogue with the company that did not previously exist. The Oversight Board’s decision. January 29, 2021. ” In the altered image, the faces of the original actors are replaced by the U. In September 2021, for the first time In July 2022, the Oversight Board accepted a request from Meta to assess whether it should continue to remove certain categories of COVID-19 misinformation, or whether a less restrictive approach would better align with its values and human rights responsibilities. The Oversight Board’s Recommendations. This policy advisory opinion is the Board’s response to that request. Users submitted more than a million appeals to the Board through December 2021, with more than 8 in 10 appeals to restore content to Facebook or Instagram concerning posts which supposedly violated Meta’s rules on bullying, hate speech, or violence and incitement. The Oversight Board, established in 2020, was meant to provide accountability for Meta’s decisions about what speech should be allowed on Facebook and Instagram. 2 Policy Advisory Statement. The Oversight Board website has the latest news on the cases that the Oversight Board is currently considering, issued case decisions and policy advisory opinions, and copies of the Oversight Board’s governing documents. Under its Charter , the Oversight Board may review appeals from users whose content Meta removed, appeals from users who reported content that Meta left up Oversight boards date back to the early 1900s. S. Two cases have been selected by the Board, including the case accepted by the Board last week relating to former US President Trump’s indefinite The Oversight Board has overturned Meta's original decision to remove a Facebook post protesting the Iranian government, containing the slogan "marg bar Khamenei. Most importantly, as we announced in April 2023, Meta no longer plays a role The Oversight Board is a global deliberative body of experts who operate at the intersection of content moderation and human rights to drive accountability in how Meta moderates content on Facebook, Instagram and Threads, with special attention to advancing freedom of expression. Alongside an overview of the Board’s activities during this period, we also demonstrate how the recommendations we have made since 2021 continue to push Meta to The Oversight Board agrees that Facebook was correct to reverse its original decision to remove content on Facebook that shared a news post about a threat of violence from the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Palestinian group Hamas. The Oversight Board is a body of experts from around the world that exercises independent judgment and makes binding decisions on what content should be allowed on Facebook and Instagram. According to data from the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE), nearly 150 such oversight boards currently exist in the U. In four cases of videos showing the assassination of Mexican mayoral candidate José Alfredo Facebook footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon Youtube footer icon Instagram footer icon Twitter footer icon Linkedin footer icon H2 2023 Transparency Report: How the Board’s Ongoing Impact Is Making a Difference. Keep in mind that you have 15 days from when the decision was made to appeal to the Oversight Board. “The . To address this, boards must prioritize information access, ensuring that stakeholders have timely and accurate data to make informed decisions. The Oversight Board has upheld Facebook’s decision to suspend Mr. The Oversight Board overturns Facebook’s decision to remove the content and requires that the post be restored. Oversight Board At the Oversight Board, our people are the heart of our organization, and their passion for human rights, free expression and technology helps us to fulfill our mission. " Facebook, Twitter, and Telegram have all been banned in Iran since 2009. 4) states: The Oversight Board overturns Meta’s original decisions to remove two Facebook posts and one Instagram post, all of which discussed abortion. The Board finds that removing the content in this case is consistent with Meta’s human rights responsibilities in an armed conflict. Not all content decisions are eligible for appeal to the Oversight Board. The Oversight Board makes independent and binding decisions about some of the most challenging content on Facebook and Instagram. Case Significance This case highlights Meta’s shortcomings in accurately identifying satirical content on its platforms. March 19, 2024. “After you have exhausted Facebook’s appeals process, you will receive an Oversight Board Reference ID and can appeal the decision to the Board. Facebook did in effect create an appointment panel, by first appointing the four co-chairs. Content policy. 1 Content Decision. February 27, 2025 New Case Involves Likely Fake Audio Call About Rigging Elections in Iraqi Kurdistan February 13, 2025 New Cases Involve Symbols Adopted by Dangerous Organizations These three cases concern content decisions made by Meta, all on Facebook, which the Oversight Board intends to address together. Around the world Facebook is being used to Chairperson of the Uwezo Fund Oversight Board, Ms. With civilian mistrust of police and law enforcement coming to a head in many cities with questionable officer conduct, these boards were created to bridge the gap and help build that The Oversight Board has upheld Facebook's decision to remove a post discussing South African society under its Hate Speech Community Standard. Join us as observers and advocates holding the ACJOB accountable for protecting the rights and well-being of people inside the jail. May 9, 2024. It was a milestone in Facebook’s response to compelling calls for greater accountability and transparency. They were initially created to try to eliminate undue political pressure on police, but it failed. Facebook removed the content for violating its policy on Violence and Incitement, and in its referral indicated to the Oversight Board that this case presents an example of the challenges faced when addressing the risk of offline harm that can be caused by misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic. kvwvt cil eelc kpxpd kpbxw fcouce qdk ogitrh yrxv fysh jcdxcbo fze zlf zlz jfjc